Guilt:
A Love Story (a comedy of terrors)
The Parker Playhouse, Fort Lauderdale
May 19, 2012
This
one is harder to write about because I didn’t especially enjoy it. But for its
shortcomings, it might actually be as educational (or even more so) than the
Lily Tomlin show or Old Jews Telling
Jokes.
John
Fugelsang bills himself as a political comedian. He is a radio personality (I was
not aware of him before this show), a cabaret performer, comic, and actor in
regional theatre. He is apparently a regular on cable news programs (MSNBC,
FOX, CNN, HLN, etc.). So, he was in town, it was a one person show, I felt
compelled to check him out.
Fugelsang
opened (to about 200 people in a room that seats 1200) by saying that one
person shows are difficult and often terrible because the performer has a
political agenda and gets preachy or has a captive audience and uses them as
group therapy to work out the performer’s own issues. He then (jokingly?) said,
“Tonight’s show is all of that!” And, it was.
The
rest of the show then was a personal story about his Catholic upbringing and
his feelings about organized religion and his relationship with his mother and
his relationship with his wife. For most of us, our introduction to this man
was to hear his life story. Honestly, it wasn’t a great way to spend an hour
and 45 minutes of non-intermission, rainy weather theatre on a Saturday night.
His
anger at the Catholic church was justified, but not necessarily entertaining or
even interesting. His story of how his parents met was compelling…his father
was a Catholic Brother/history teacher and his mother a Catholic nun/nurse who
met and it was love at first sight, but because of their vows they didn’t speak
of it for 10 years. The dad finally revealed his feelings of unrequited love
and they left their orders and got married and had children, John being the
first. So, he was the first child born after they broke their promise to the
God of their understanding to be celibate for the rest of their lives.
Apparently, that bit of info was used in unhealthy ways against John in his
upbringing.
He
went on to tell of how his mother guilted him into marrying his lover of 11
years, how his father outlived a prognosis by 5 years because of an
experimental procedure in Asia, a time he was nearly arrested for carrying drugs
in the airport (marijuana for a sick friend), and about a time he debated
racist David Duke on television.
It
might have made a better essay or book than a performance. Or, if he had some
relationship to the audience, his personal story might have been of more
interest. If he was performing in a night club with regular customers, in a
church where he had a relationship to the congregation, or if he was more
famous (from being on a television sit-com perhaps) then the fictive
relationship that exists between star and adoring public would have made his
story more compelling, but as it was, it really did seem as if a few of us came
out in the rain to hear a stranger tell about how the church had scarred him,
how his mother used guilt as a weapon (how incredibly not unique!), and how he
had survived some adventures with racists, airport security, and shot gun weddings.
I’ve
seen autobiographical performances that were spell-binding, but again, that was
because I felt I knew the performer in some way. S/he was part of my community
speaking from as well as to the community, or s/he had a special interest in
LBGT people or some group to which I claimed membership, or s/he had come into
my living room time and again via television (or otherwise into my life through
film, literature, radio, or theatre), and so an imaginary bond existed before
the performance, or the story itself was at least partly fictional.
For
example, when Phyllis Diller would tell stories about her fictive husband “Fang”
that bit was often hilarious. But she created a world that invited the audience
to be part of it, and as Fang was part of her regular shtick, to hear Diller
perform (for many years at least) was to want to hear about Fang (Totie Fields
did that with her real life husband who became part of her act, and Bette
Midler did it with her “Soph” character based on the stage persona of Sophie
Tucker, and Lily Tomlin did recently by weaving personal stories among the
skits she created with fictional characters). To tell one’s own story, there
must be a connection, I think, and if one does not exist, one must be made
before the audience is likely to care about the performer’s plight.
In
his book, Getting Your Solo Act Together,
Michael Kearns gives some Dos and Don’ts of solo performance, and
they include:
Don’t write a solo show
based on your life as a model.
Do consider a dramaturg
or a good writing class.
Do learn the art of
self-editing.
Don’t stay on stage
more than seventy minutes (pp. 66-67).
After
seeing a 105 minute show completely about the life of a man I had never heard of
before the show, I now see the wisdom of Kearns’ counsel!
2 comments:
I'm glad to get your review on the show. Eh. I feel funny about having egged you on to go to this. Next time I'm in south Florida, I'll buy you and Robert drinks.
Live theatre, always worth the time, even when it doesn't appeal to a critical audience memeber.
It was a rainy, dreary night in a venue 6 times larger than the actual audience...that might have had a negative impact on the mood and reception.
There was plenty of laughter; for all i know, everyone loved every minute of it (save me, and even at that I didn't have a miserable time, and i couldn't have judged without seeing it, so i had to see it).
I'm studying solo performance right now, so all such performances, those that inspire and those that don't, all serve a purpose.
And drinks are always in order!
Post a Comment